Is there anything in the future that will be able to properly match a vender statement? There was an unfortunate change a few years ago not allowing a date change when entering and closing a p.o. this made it very difficult to match a venders statement. I know it is said this is not an accounting pr...

I WAS RECENTLY TOLD THEY HAVE NO INTENTION OF CHANGING THIS.

Appointment end time should change with time promised. Assigned tech should update from work order back to scheduler. Editing spelling of someones name in Mitchell that was converted to RO through schedule should update name in schedule. Print preview displays no valuable information. Work Week view...

Can't legibly read more than 4 techs incoming work. Jobs overlap each other and cannot view what is coming in. If multiple appointments for the same time, you do not get a description of each appointment. Sometimes you only see a partial name. This is especially true if a client has an end time with...

Well now that method is not working either. When running reports, they take the closed date of the P.O. as the date for searching which is now no longer editable.

What I have come up with is to create a po using a return memo number. Add the parts to the list, (of course with negative dollar amounts since Mitchell has not figured out a return part po system, then leave the po open until it actually goes through. If it does not go through until the next month,...

I know inventory control for reconciling our purchase orders ahs always been lacking. We have been able to work around credits and returns so our POs for each vender can come out correctly on a report for a given billing cycle. Now that 6.5 is here, the date for a PO is fixed. In the past we could a...